On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Blake Matheny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? > > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like > > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp... > Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go > would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done. I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype> and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms, but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.?
-- Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
