On Monday 02 February 2004 19:01, James Harlow wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:59:33AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote: > > Not sure about the implimentation of a stable:arch, > > though I'm sure carpaski and team is loath to having a new > > field added as an alternative (stable:true/false?). > > Wouldn't it make more sense to keep it as a seperate tree, distributed > on seperate servers? This would take care of issues such as: > > * only allowing Gentoo Stable users (ie ones who have coughed up) > to access it;
As it is now, gentoo stable will be free. I think it will stay free too. > * not requiring contributing users (ie ones who have paypalled us > money) to support paying users; There will be no paying users before these very valid issues have been addressed. I personally don't think paying users is such a good idea at the moment. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
