On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 14:55 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:54:02 +0000 Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Lance Albertson wrote: > > | > I think we can handle the bandwidth, we just need a box for that. > > | > Robbat2 had some ideas on how to make it fly in read-only mode. If > > | > anyone would like to donate such a box, please let me know. > > | > > | It wouldn't be local to the other infrastructure, but is > > | gentooexperimental.org up to this task? > > > > Sssss! If you don't talk about it it might go away. > > Does the same work on you? :P
Actually, it is usually easier to just start on some x86-only thread. After the initial loud "x86 sucks!" tie raid, he'll run off to go back and surround himself in some Sparc loving to wash the uncleanliness of x86 from himself. That'll buy you at least a couple days. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
