On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:53 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 16:30 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > Repoman doesn't even work in gentoo-x86/eclass, thanks for playing. > > > Thanks for not listening, moron. > > > > Ahh, yes. Allow me to show you other developers this. This is the > > point where the argument breaks down. The opposing side in the debate > > has no positive answer, so instead has turned to personal attack. You > > just have to love acts of desperation. > > Look: > Me and Daniel have been insulted and called different not-so-nice things > by you, Stuart and Ciaran. Our arguments have been ignored or refuted > using orthogonal examples (e.g. touching a completely different > problem).
Did you just ignore Jon's request for you to *STOP* with this thread? It's embarrassing seeing this going on a list of ours. Please, stop this nonsense. Its not getting anywhere. If anything please take both of your arguements in private. None of us are reading this thread anymore. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
