Hi, At Sat, 2 Aug 2003 22:38:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> oooooooooh and stop trying to run the `patch` cmd yourself ... Agreed ;-) > no one is cooler than `epatch` (which is integrated into portage now, so dont > 'inherit eutils'), so stop trying to think you ppl are I'm afraid we should add 'inherit eutils' because though epatch is now integrated into unstable version of portage, stable version of portage (2.0.48-r5) doesn't have this functionality. I came across the problem in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23131#c11 and found we need 'inherit eutils' for stable. Anyhow, some of the ebuilds seem to use epatch without 'inherit eutils' (and I guess they will fail to compile properly). I counted that sort of ebuild using small sh script and it says 332 ebuilds use epatch without declairing 'inherit eutlis' ;-( Well, I included both stable and unstable ebuilds, but at least for stable we need to write 'inherit epatch' at this moment. cf. here is the list of such ebuilds: http://dev.gentoo.org/~usata/ebuild_wepatch_woeutils.txt -- Mamoru KOMACHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dev.gentoo.org/~usata/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
