On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 23:38 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:15 +0200, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenà wrote:
> > - the new ebuilds should add a new configuration file with the new syntax, > > and > > should depend on: || ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.78 virtual/pam ). This would fix > > the > > previous point, as who is using openpam will use the ~arch packages which > > will be fixed one by one (by me, submitting patches to maintainers), this > > way > > the packages will work out-of-the-box for both g/linux and g/fbsd users (i > > haven't searched on macosx, but should be, as they have the same userlands > > of > > fbsd). > > > > Ugh, no - just more crud that somebody will have to clean out later. > Like I said, get pam-0.78 and issues fixed, bumped to stable on all > linux archs, and we can scourge the tree. > Actually, its in ~, so should be fine if we want to start doing it. Just keeping it synced might be an issue as as we can not depend on >=pam-0.78 ... -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
