On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 08:07 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 07:54, Alin Nastac wrote: > > Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > >On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 06:34, Alin Nastac wrote: > > >>IMO, www-proxy should be renamed to net-proxy, for allowing me to move > > >>various SOCKS packages into it. > > >>The packages qualified for moving are: > > >> - net-misc/3proxy > > >> - net-misc/dante > > >> - net-misc/nylon > > >> - net-misc/tsocks > > >> > > >>I also think now is the time for creating another category containing > > >>all types of tunnels found in net-misc > > >> > > >>Thoughts? > > > > > >Leave as is. Read the metadata.xml for www-proxy: > > > > > > The www-proxy category contains network proxy software. > > > > I am aware of that. However, in the event I move socks to this category, > > the name is misleading. I will not move 'em unless the name is changed. > > Just because the category is prefixed with 'www' ? That's silly (imo), but > hey, it's your choice...
I wouldn't search for socks proxy software in a www category either. net-proxy sounds much more appealing. -- (o_ Markus Nigbur //\ Gentoo GNU/Linux Developer [ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org GPG Fingerprint: 9E31 187A 6C78 210C F248 EDBB F2FB A77F 707D F8C1 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
