Stephen P. Becker wrote: > This is really getting into a whole different > discussion altogether about having a security update only tree, but > there has been talk of this a few times before...search the mailing list > archives.
Yep, of course I know; I wasn't asking for "stable" tree. > Removing old profiles will do nothing other than forcing them to set a > new profile. Changing the profile won't stop people from doing security > only updates. Okay, as long as "changing the profile" won't affect people *much* (I mean if it doesn't break their boxes), it is perfectly correct. I asked just to make sure that broken /etc/make.profile won't completely screw up Portage or so :-). -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
