On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:47:51AM +0200, Johannes Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Tom Martin wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:11:38PM +0200, Johannes Weiner <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * More staff needed > > > Despite the autodeletion of uptodate packages there has to be > > > someone attending the list. Remove real spam or uptodate packages > > > where the targetversion is principally right but not in the correct > > > format, so the autodeletion doesn't match. > > > > How does it fit in with metadata.xml, and the maintainers and herds > > listed therein? > > I don't get the context. Why metadata.xml? And why maintainers and herds > listed?
Well, if this just creates an entry to the list with no mention of the email address of the maintainer, if given in metadata.xml, then it's pretty pointless in my opinion as no-one but the maintainer could/should bump software unless you've got a go-ahead from the maintainer or there are exceptional circumstances. My request is that when a new entry is added to the list, the software used checks the package's metadata.xml and includes the herd and maintainer on the list. If there is a maintainer specified, it sends an email to the maintainer. Maybe it would be better to tell maintainers to just subscribe to projects on freshmeat? Hope that makes sense now, Tom -- Tom Martin, http://dev.gentoo.org/~slarti AMD64, net-mail, shell-tools, vim, recruiters Gentoo Linux
pgp3tqNx5PEdD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
