Jon Portnoy wrote:
>>Symlink? If MIT == MetaKit, then:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>ln -s MIT MetaKit
> I don't know about this specific case but generally speaking licenses
> that're similar in language and intent have very small (often cosmetic)
> differences; if there is even the slightest difference it (legally)
> qualifies as a different license and probably really should be included
> separately to be safe
Exactly my point :) I've looked at MIT and MetaKit and:
+Copyright (c) 1996-2001 Jean-Claude Wippler
-Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>
Except formatting and above diff theye are identical.
--
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik RLU #322999 GPG:0xBC555551
gentoo - kernel 2.6.11-ck10
http://fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl/~nelchael/
.... now touch these wires to your tongue!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
