Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I think you know what I mean. By definition portage is allready there for
the ebuild to be evaluated. It is therefore unnecessary to specify it as
a dependency.
Sure I understood that. However, your post said exactly the opposite:
"... building does not depend on portage being there."
Also note that I said "implicit dependency". Well, guess I shouldn't
send nitpicking mails anymore.
> Besides that for most packages any compatible package
> manager should work (there just is only portage now though).
Didn't I say that myself?
Marius
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
