On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 18:01 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: > Jonathan Smith wrote: > > The desktop-misc herd (which was sadly neglected until recently) could > > benefit from a new virtual. x11-misc/xautolock is a wrapper which locks > > the screen via any appropriate program such as xlockmore or xtrlock. > > xscreensaver locks the screen, too, besides its normal screensaver > features (like xlockmore). > > > This program needs to depend on an xlocker, but we should not lock users > > into one specific one. > > > > See bug 95246 [1] > > > > I would probably name it virtual/xlocker, but other suggestions are, of > > course, welcome. > > > > Thanks > > > > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95246 > >
You don't have to setup a virtual for this. In fact, the simpler method
(especially when dealing with only one package) is to use the || *DEPEND
syntax.
RDEPEND="|| (
x11-misc/xscreensaver
x11-misc/xlockmore
x11-misc/xtrlock )"
This would prefer xscreensaver over the others, but any would satisfy
the dependency.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
