-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian D. Harring wrote: | Essentially it's squashing old noise on the bugs till we can actually | address it. Like I said above, two main thrusts of work are stable, | and mangling the codebase so that we can actually pull this stuff off, | and with the limited # of people hacking on portage, more time devoted | to that the better.
I definitely share your feeling on the limited number of people. But what I think this will do is (1) nothing about the noise from bugs; people will still post on them if it's LATER, and (2) produce a bunch of dupes from people who are only searching for open bugs. So in my mind, it has all the benefits of simply classifying enhancements correctly plus the downside of actually creating more work. Best of luck with it, though. Keep us posted on how it works. Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC6R4xXVaO67S1rtsRArbRAJ9CtEm7RvdjFFYBAd+0qlv0lTv3FQCfcLCA bocASAAm08kY7uuJ7pA6zcc= =AOCP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
