Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:36:18 +0000 > Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. One > > time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about using the > > commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog entry already > > exists, then write nothing to Changelog. > > I'm sure you can manage to write a bash function to call echangelog and > repoman commit with the same message.
Sure, I can and the other mail shows that it is *realy* simple, but why should every dev write his own "script", when this could be done once for all? Nevermind.. If I don't provide patches for repoman I shouldn't bitching around! ;-) Regards, Markus Rothe
pgp5r0VEVkfRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
