-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:03:18 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" > | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > wrote: > | > | > Because that won't help in the slightest. > | > | > | > | So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing > | > | things by default is bad? Explain? > | > > | > No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp > | > of approval upon bug closures is worthless. > | > | So you're problem isn't with the peer review I'm proposing but instead > | quality of work of the team leads? > > Not at all. I'm saying that a) most 'team leads' will not do proper > checks because they don't have time to and b) the limited time that > 'team leads' have is better spent elsewhere.
I really am curious here: a) What are the team leads spending most of their time on? b) What is more important than improving the code? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDB0zS2QTTR4CNEQARAjUbAJ92tanYPNEXx6ZHyiZcFDjHpohgHQCePN0t v9BxNT1eetr9uZ8Be5PwEAw= =50IR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
