On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:58:05AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > On 08/26/05 Brian Harring wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:44:44AM -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: > > > Hows the upgrade path RE: end-user useflag changes? Will everyone > > > that has gtk in their make.conf die a horrible death if they don't > > > see the upgrade notice? when will they see the upgrade notice? > > > Would it make sense to leave the gtk flag for a while at least, to > > > ease the end user into an upgrade? > > Not saying it's a clean idea, but aside from making a lot of noise > > about the change over (which should be delayed till that noise has > > been made), a base/profile.bashrc trick of substituting gtk in when > > gtk1 is detected would work. > > Hell no. Don't need to add more confusion to the use flag confusion. Instead, confuse the hell out of users who don't religiously follow -dev/-user/-gwn, and suddenly get bit by the gtk flag losing it's meaning?
That said, it won't work anyways; the aliasing has to occur within the python side else it'll screw up the depgraph (realized that just a few seconds ago) :) So... back to making a lot of noise, or some python side support for aliasing use flags. ~harring
pgpfNB2mFzyUY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
