On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd > | > have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even > | > remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit). > | > | Try asking the submitter? *grin* > > Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we > tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever > rather than a full category though.
That would be fine. In fact, it would be fine if it were just *somewhere* in the bug report, except for the automated message you're going to be sending out would be much more useful if it were in the summary, even if it is just a rough idea. Remember that not *everything* will need the summary there right away, since not every request for clarification will be immediately answered, but increasing the likelihood of the category being there increases the likelihood of the package being picked up. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
