On Tuesday 13 September 2005 08:22 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>It certainly says they're responsible for adding and removing > >>developers, but I don't see anything about them being solely responsible > >>for revoking access. > > > > no, nowhere does it say 'devrel is the only team which may revoke > > access', but it is the only team which says they can and i'd prefer it > > stay that way > > I would like there to be a clause that infra has the ability to at least > temporarily revoke access to have the ability to protect our servers if > something came up quickly. I've always made sure any permanent removals > go through devrel first.
that would make a lot of sense -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
