On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:42:19AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Nathan L. Adams wrote: > > > What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis > > Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and > > Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive. > > The idea behind -infra temporary revoke power is to react to emergency > situations (as in "we must do something *now*"). Not sure a repeated QA > violation would fall into that "emergency" category. > > The solution is rather to have a devrel liaison inside the QA team (or > the other way around). These are not closed groups.
Agreed. We don't need a second devrel, rather we need to make sure QA isn't ignored by devrel -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
