On Friday 16 September 2005 00:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > actually this is came up in the meeting as something we would like to see > spelled out explicitly ... either as a GLEP itself or as a policy update to > current stabilization practices > > the GLEP was approved on the grounds that we need an x86 team and that it > needs to be treated as any other arch ... arch team interaction with > maintainers should be spelled out clearly rather than part of a single > sentence '... or make individual arrangements with the x86 arch team.'
Ok, I do think that we will need a way for the maintainer to indicate that the package is stable. I'd be happy to leave stabilizing out of my hands, but I wouldn't want my packages to be stabilized before I deem it stable. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpXfO7Hi2DW6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
