Mark Loeser wrote:
Since we currently have language herds for other languages such as Ada,
Perl, and Java, I don't think C++ should be any different. There are
currently many packages in the tree that are C++ libraries or utilities
that are no-herd and are actively maintained, and there are probably
some that have just been sitting around rotting. With the creation of a
C++ herd, there would be a team that could support these packages,
instead of a single maintainer, if the package has one. Below is a list
of all of the packages that I believe would qualify as falling under
this herd. If you see your name in the following list, I'd especially
like to hear from you. Names with a '?' next to them are packages that
had no metadata and I guessed from the changelog who the maintainer is.
I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the dev-cpp
category:
<snip>
I'm game.
--
Who's scruffy-looking?
-- Han Solo
Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ BSD | commonbox | cron | cvs-utils | mips | netmon | shell-tools | vim ]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
