Phil Richards wrote: > On 2005-09-14, John N. Laliberte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Normally, I would just unmask pmount, but the comment doesn't exactly > fill me with confidence as regards the stability of pmount (and whereas > I am happy for gnome to crash in a heap, I tend to be a little more > cautious around things that work at lower levels in the system)... >
Actually if you look at the comment you can see that it is dbus and hal that seem to have the problems. I have used pmount without a problem for quite a while now. There is one bug open about pmount on bugs.gentoo.org but for me it looks like a user error. > > Should I just go ahead and unmask, or what if I want to test out gnome > 2.12? That I leave up to you. > > phil Regards, Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
