-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Grant Goodyear wrote: | Um, sort of? The council exists mainly to make cross-project decisions. | I suppose that this issue counts, since it involves both the baselayout | folks and the GDP, but the GDP doesn't really care which logger is | installed by virtual/logger, as long as they know when it changes. As | such, I would say that it's up to the package maintainers (base-system) | to make that decision. Oh, I suppose that if base-system were to choose | poorly, and large numbers of devs were upset, then the council would get | involved, but this issue just doesn't seem that contentious. I've heard | lots of people state that they would rather have logger "foo" as the | default, but those same people will just shrug and install their | favorite if foo isn't chosen. It's just not that big a deal. | If the council chooses to address this issue I'm hardly going to | complain, but I don't really think that it's worth their time.
Somebody already pointed this out, but baselayout has nothing to do with the profiles, where virtual/logger is specified. That's the base system project, and in particular the arch teams. Although it's not clear who controls the top-level profiles, since it could be either releng or base the way I see it. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTUr1XVaO67S1rtsRAgnvAJ9hCzay9NmGdojgzaW9cQNGcqXDhQCeP+Lk 0I79vRe3r6wamAd47rDdAHI= =Kjlq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
