>> > i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-* >> >> noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off. >> AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan and to >> have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on. > > that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been > > i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all other > 'no*' USE flags from portage
Sorry, guys, but isn't that what "-FOO" is supposed to be for? If we already have support for "-FOO", why then do we need a "noFOO" also? Or is there some distinction I'm missing here? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
