-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > Yeah, see, this is a case where not understanding the structure of > Gentoo gives you the wrong impression. The GDP's policy applies to the > GDP. That is not a global developer policy of any kind. It is a policy > by a project, for that project. > > If I were, for example, to write up a nice guide for something on the > games team and do it all in ASCII art, that policy has no bearing on > what I do. If I were to write something for the GDP, then it would. > > At any rate, that has *zero* bearing on whether or not our update > information needs to be written in GuideXML, so there's no point in > arguing it with you. >
So you're saying that Gentoo consists of projects that are completely 'silo'd up' and have no bearing whatsoever on each other. Then the DevRel project only has bearing on those who actually join DevRel. Neat, a group formed for the sole purpose of coordinating itself. Security need only concern itself with securing its members (from who knows what!), and infra can just ignore the needs of everyone else (different project!). I wonder how any of the other projects *ever* made it onto the website... The errata.g.o (not the summaries w/ link that emerge would output) would obviously be documentation, would obviously be governed by the Doc rules, and it would be irrelevant which staff member happened to publish a particular guide. If Gentoo really is as balkanized as you state, then it is a sad state of affairs indeed. Maybe the 'full fledged' versions should be GuideXML-lite or something, I'm not sure, but your argument is just silly. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDa5WH2QTTR4CNEQARAlERAKCeVue4ATD4fXBgLGdRAWt4Gi7vWgCcCs7R w/Pvjk9vv2C00HmrTkhBnHU= =Eiba -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
