-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: | What I want to hear is if anyone has good reasons to not allowing | choosing the tar command between the two compatible alternatives (both | works fine with portage). If nobody has reasons, I'll be back in a | couple of days with eclass, modified ebuilds, and if I can find time to | learn about it an eselect module to select a generic "tool" (tar only | in this moment).
Sure. What's the point? What benefit does one tar have over the other? How is bsdtar more capable in any situation than gnutar? Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDb5tMXVaO67S1rtsRAj9vAKDA7OQ3FCDDEHSExLuF5zll19EbtACgpSkq KY35vUu27fks6SktZ5gUEnk= =6Mlg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
