19.11.2005, 5:30:35, Stephen P. Becker wrote: >> Testing ebuilds when keywording/marking stable is supposed to be >> mandatory and such stuff does not belong into changelogs.
> Sorry, but that's a big no. People that add/remove keywords without > making note in the Changelog deserve a massive kick in the nuts. I'm > not sure if you have been paying attention to Changelogs, but all of the > sane arches have and will continue to make such entries. > -Steve Grrrmhhh, was it so much unclear? I mean: "stable on x86" definitely belongs to changelogs, while "stable on x86, thanks Jim for opening a keywording bug, Jack and Jim for testing and Joe for reminding me five times to mark it finally stable when I forgot about it" does NOT. It's the responsibility of the developer who keyworded the thing anyway, ATs are not allowed to keyword stuff and don't have RW CVS access, so what is the purpose of tracking such stuff in changelogs and cluttering them? Use CVS commit messages to track such things if you think you need it. -- jakub
pgpjq8z3F08C9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
