22.11.2005, 17:30:50, Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:


> Also, the problem is not so much needing manpower for testing as far as
> Release Engineering is concerned.  It is instead having some method in
> place where devs actually perform QA on their own packages.  A prime
> example of this is bug #110383.  I was always under the impression that
> if you were adding a flag to a package that affected "system" that it
> was your responsibility to ensure that "system" still works, rather than
> passing it off onto the Release Engineering team.  Now, I don't know
> what package it is that is pulling in hal for this user, so it most
> likely is not hal's fault, but it illustrates the point perfectly.

Blame vapier for that one ;p (Bug 99533 half-fixed for ~arch only);
alternatively, you can blame usata for adding emacs support to gpm in the first
place (Bug 80217).


-- 

jakub

Attachment: pgprFm6K2qXMG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to