On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:33:34 +0100 Marc Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote: > [..] > > So much for background information, now to the actual question: > > Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests > > and Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger > > portage tree (in the long term the format will be phased out > > hopefully) or rather wait for Manifest2 support (which will > > definitely include multi hash support)? > > I'd rather wait for Manifest2 support. > What is the ETA for the GLEP and the implementation after i? GLEP I still have to start writing (mostly a reformatting of a mail I sent a long time ago), there is already a prototype implementation (doesn't cover everything yet but works generally), target is for when current trunk will be released (still have to settle on a version for it), which should hopefully be after 2.0.54 gets out (which should be in the next few weeks). At a guess I'd say 4 months till stable (but really, that's just a guess, see the 2.1 fiasko). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
