25.11.2005, 8:06:51, Flammie Pirinen wrote: > 2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
>> So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to >> Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in the meantime. > Uh-oh. The usability regression from what the site was yesterday is > unbelievable. Almost all of the texts are too small to read again, and > the color combinations are also unreadable again. I hope that you and > Aaron are still going to take into account at least all the usability > related requests from the feedback you asked, because I'd be pretty > annoyed to see yet another web site redesign that manages to make > original website even more unusable than it was. Ouch, what happened again?!... I can't agree more. I object to any redesign if the whole thing was arranged so badly that all the accessibility flaws are to be considered an unchangeable part of the "design". Better stick w/ the current one in that case. :-( -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
pgpd4hgTLeSpP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
