25.11.2005, 8:06:51, Flammie Pirinen wrote:

> 2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:

>> So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to 
>> Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in the meantime.

> Uh-oh. The usability regression from what the site was yesterday is
> unbelievable. Almost all of the texts are too small to read again, and
> the color combinations are also unreadable again.  I hope that you and
> Aaron are still going to take into account at least all the usability
> related requests from the feedback you asked, because I'd be pretty
> annoyed to see yet another web site redesign that manages to make
> original website even more unusable than it was.

Ouch, what happened again?!... I can't agree more. I object to any redesign if
the whole thing was arranged so badly that all the accessibility flaws are to
be considered an unchangeable part of the "design". Better stick w/ the current
one in that case. :-(


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

Attachment: pgpd4hgTLeSpP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to