On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:25:52AM -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > >>Of course, all of these points would have made it into the GLEP *if* it > >>had been posted with plenty of time for people to comment on it instead > >>of one day. > > > > > >harping on this old point solves nothing. we've already established quite > >clearly that this will not happen again in the future. > > Technically, no. It does, however, point out that the council basically > screwed infra up the rear without using lube, and then told infra, "we > don't care, we won't discuss changing it, and we would approve it again!"
it's really more up to the GLEP author(s) and infra to find the middle ground as to what's feasible. if none can be found, then yes, i would whip out my virtual wang and take it to infra again with the subdomain idea (i would however offer lube; more for myself though). -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
