On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:27:19AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > > > Only problem I see with this is binary packages. We can not control > > > upstream binaries as everyone is aware of. So when does it become safe > > > to override stable packages that have texrel's and executable stacks? > > > > no idea what you mean by "override", but here's a crazy idea ... ask > > upstream to fix the issues. for example, we just reported executable > > stacks with the ut2004 game and Ryan of epicgames was so kind as to > > fix it up for us. some upstream peeps dont even know about these sort > > of things until you point them out. > > Let me take that back again. This is resolved on amd64, but not on x86. > There's 2 binaries. This also explains why I didn't see the error and > closed the bug, I'm on amd64, whereas the bug reporter is on x86.
yeah, Ryan's one cool cat -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
