Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > use.local.desc:app-text/ghostscript-afpl:jasper - Enable support for > jpeg2k (jasper) > use.local.desc:kde-base/kdegraphics:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:kde-base/kdelibs:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:net-proxy/ziproxy:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:sci-libs/gdal:jasper - Adds support for JPEG 2000 > > > I was just about adding another one and thought it would be better to merge > them to a global jpeg2k use flag. Complains?
Query: Which would be more appropriate in this case? "jasper" for the library it pulls in as a depend, or "jpeg2k" for the functionality that library provides? There's nothing else in the tree (as far as I can tell) which provides JPEG-2000, but there could be. -- I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish. -- Rita Mae Brown
pgpmGuHXQ3WOx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
