On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote: > > > Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in > > > without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even > > > sure. > > You're mixing up 'strict' with 'stricter'. > Well if I'm mixing up, someone moved the QA checks from stricter to strict > lately ;) > I don't run strict as I usually have modified ebuilds if I'm working on them; > I don't run stricter as lot of packages that fails are not mine, I usually > use it only when I'm testing my packages or my changes.
strict is in make.defaults... This causes packages with executable stacks to die, and fairly arbitrarily imo (with portage 2.1_pre2 that is) (see bug 116611). IMUO, portage should never die when an issue of questionable merit comes up and features are simply those set by default. > > -- > Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ > Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
