On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:00AM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 03:11, Brian Harring wrote: > > Never said anything about 2.1 + resolver enhancements (no clue where > > that one came from). Merely commenting on your raised issues about > > use/slot deps. > > From your words. Thanks for destroying my hope in two sentences. ;p > So we add this dependency enhancement without having a Portage version in > place that can resolve issues as they appeare!?! Scary.
Who said anything about this going into portage _without_ the resolver enhancements? Re-read my emails, I've stated the resolver improvements are *required* for use/slot to go in (specifically use). So... yeah, you're not following what I've been saying. ~harring
pgpc9KHL8TcON.pgp
Description: PGP signature
