3.1.2006, 12:47:27, Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> So you have now taken what was described as an automatic solution to
> reduce size into a manual process, reducing usability of the ChangeLog
> and increasing workload for every ebuild developer.

> I'm sorry, but I still think the idea of simply RSYNC_EXCLUDEing the
> ChangeLog by default would be a much better solution.

+1; I frequently find even pretty old changelog entries useful (even the
'stable on foo' ones are useful, if you need to find out who keyworded the
thing stable despite the fact that it's severely broken).

As for RSYNC_EXCLUDE by default, that's not something that should be
considered until GLEP 42 or an equivalent solution gets implemented.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

Attachment: pgpv20IbxGk5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to