9.1.2006, 17:28:04, Andrea Barisani wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: >> >> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? >> >> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? >> >> > USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. >> >> NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned >> realplayer thing again.
> It's the realplayer thing that should be fixed. Can't believe that > ca-certificates got relatively quiet as a PDEPEND because of that ;). No, it's not, it's FETCHCOMMAND/wget thing. Would like to hear about alternatives besides those discussed ad nauseam in Bug 101457. Realplayer does *not* depend on ca-certificates in ANY way, it's FETCHCOMMAND that's broken w/ unknown CA and self-signed certificates. Since not honoring self-signed certificates by default can be hardly considered as a bug, hence the depenency on ca-certificates in wget. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
pgpcX6wvYqpUZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
