-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:53 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>>
>>>> Make this distributed tool for tar zip bzip2 and gzip and I'm in, I
>>>> don't think it would be useful with anything else than Gigabit Ethernet.
>> One 2Ghz CPU can't even saturate a 100Mbit line with bzip2 as far as I
>> can tell.
>> Although the speedups won't be extreme it could just work.
>>
>>
>>>> We might want to have in the make.conf 2 separate variables, one of them
>>>> saying how many threads can be run on the machine, then How many
>>>> threads/process across a cluster.
>>>>
>>>> For example, my Dual Xeon EM64T file server can do make -j4  locally,
>>>> like in make install, make docs etc etc, But for compiling I can use
>>>> -j20, really not useful over -j8 anyway. But the point is, it would be
>>>> usefully to separate the load distribution on the local machine and
>>>> cluster nodes.
>>> As the discusison started...
>>>
>>> I would like to be able to limit the -jN when there is no distcc host
>>> available or when compiling c++ code, otherwise my poor laptop is dead with
>>> -j5 compiling pwlib when the network is down....
>> As far as I can tell distcc isn't smart enough for dynamic load balancing.
>> One could hack portage to "test" each server in the distcc host list and
>> remove missing servers for each run - doesn't look elegant to me.
> 
> Yes, might be a solution, even if not elegant. I am thinking also of
> automating distcc configuration (i.e. no need to run --set-hosts) and one
> idea is to use DNS with some TXT record, but that is just an idea - no
> patching is done yet.

Recipe for disaster, specially in a place like mine where sparc, alpha, x86_64
and ppc32/64 mix... not counting ia64 for a test run soon...

If you really want to do this, someone has to make a rendezvous a la Apple.
Where not only distcc says I am available but I am also doing the right stuff.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDx/nsP0/FkJ0eBc0RAn8aAJ9h8C1QFO0HyQmBINl2erPljgaEYwCfcOBF
yPpDJ/KElWfotWqNvWYPq3s=
=XM29
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to