Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote: > > Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. > > > Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until > > > being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to > > > express this with dependencies. > > > > You need either gcc-3.3 or libstdc++-v3. I don't see forcing either upon > > our > > users to be a good thing. The upgrade doc covers how to do the 3.3->3.4 > > upgrade, and I think most archs are on 3.4 at this point. > > Ok. If the there's an upgrade doc and 3.4 postinst points to it, no problem. > I take it the dependencies you're asking about is for binary-only (or other?) > packages that specifically depend on 3.3 then?
Nothing should explicitly depend on gcc-3.3 to compile. If that is the case, let me know and I'll try and patch the package. I am specifically asking for binary only packages that require libstdc++-v3 to depend on the virtual/libstdc++-3.3. The doc is in the gcc-3.4 postinst: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml -- Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86) email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpNNwXQ7KpE2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
