On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 06:34:32PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: > Renat Lumpau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Yes. Here's a quote from Halcy0n (with his permission): > > > > Don't mistake me not getting involved for approval. I am just not going > > to > > get involved in every single dev->dev disagreement, and certainly not > > when I > > do not have all of the facts. I wasn't aware that every team leader was > > accountable for how devs on their team behaved. > > > > This is not meant as a comment on Halcy0n's abilities as a team leader, as I > > understand he has attempted to manage the issue but "reasonable effort" has > > failed. > > > > So, my concern is: if the QA team can't manage its members effectively, > > should > > they be entrusted with tree-wide powers? > > Since one dev so far has stepped "out of line", and this is by no means the > only time it has happened, I don't see how this argument has any > merit. If it becomes a pattern where all members of the QA team are > causing problems, then I can see it as being valid. > > I don't think you will find one person that is going to say they are > capable of changing how Ciaran interacts with people. This is an > entirely different issue though, and I have talked to Ciaran about it. > What I was saying above is that I am not going to go and get involved > every single time someone has a disagreement. This situation has > obviously grown to be ridiculous and I have had a talk with him about > it, so he knows my feelings on the situation, and what I expect.
So you're saying it's ok to have one team member who steps out of line and cannot be managed? Are all teams allowed that exception? -- Renat Lumpau all things web-apps C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA America - land of the free* *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.
pgpFDnKmcPDOU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
