On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:28 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not > > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries > Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and > non-stripped binaries, I'd say...
Come to think of it portage-2.1_NEXT will require >=pax-utils-0.1.10 (auto fixing evil rpaths) which has support for '*.a' files now (spanky rules). We can probably obsolete the need to call 'file' all together now in prepstrip. Heres a patch also which should help you track down offending programs as they occur. should catch all cases of 'install -s' also. http://tinderbox.x86.dev.gentoo.org/portage/local/patches/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-gentoo-strip-safe.patch -- solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
