Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I wouldn't mind seeing an actual "unstable" designation added to > KEYWORDS. The basic premise would be like package.mask packages where > things can be done *within the tree* but still has the same air of "this > might be totally busted at some point" as overlays. Users would be very > unlikely to run unstable on their machines. Heck, we could even make it > impossible to actually use unstable globally if we wanted to.
Sounds like package.mask / -* right now. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
