On 8/24/25 3:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's a patchset that introduces provenance verification (i.e.
> verify-sig equivalent) for pypi.eclass.  


I strongly believe this should *not* be merged.

There are a couple reasons why I don't think this is beneficial and
would strongly push back against implementing it in any package I
maintain (even if the relevant files are uploaded to PyPI). But the main
issue is the one you said already in IRC:

"yes, it worked. yes, it's all theater"

I am opposed to implementing anything which even the author thinks is
useless.

I am opposed to implementing anything which constitutes "security
theater as a matter of policy". Security theater is a *net negative*. It
makes people think that security guarantees exist which don't in fact
exist, and they let down their guard.


-- 
Eli Schwartz

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to