On 2026-03-11 14:00:33, Ulrich Müller wrote: > > So LICENSE="dubious" would imply mirror and bindist restrictions? > > If we have strong indications that a package violates sombody else's > copyright, then we must not distribute the package at all. At least > not if we want to stay on the safe side, legally. (And I wonder if any > developer would actually add an ebuild for such a package.)
Whether or not it's a copyright violation is still unclear though. If it turns out that asking a computer to violate copyright for you is a copyright violation, then yes.
