foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > cccc-3.1.4 now in portage > > Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong. > > It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it > without adding yourself as maintainer is no form of maintenance. This is > exactly why we get complaints about a stale tree. > > I still say it should be removed in 30 days.
I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained,
and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one
if there isn't anyone to claim responsibility for the package when there
is a problem.
Just my 2 cents,
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpWuteUOvDz6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
