On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:29:58 +0200 George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friday, 28. April 2006 21:20, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > > 3) A herd does not have an email address - it's not a person or > > group of people so an email address is nonsensical. > 3a) A herd has an associated alias > 3b) Individual developers add yourself (explicitly or get added by > means of herds.xml (gentoo module in cvs, under misc)) to this alias. I thought this was the whole point of seemant's original message - it is projects or teams that have a mail alias. Some herds happen to have the same name as a project or team, but it's the team that you email, not the herd. It doesn't make sense to email a herd, any more than it makes sense to send email to an ebuild. It does however make sense to email the maintainer of a herd, in the same way as it makes sense to email the maintainer of an ebuild. -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature