On Wednesday 17 May 2006 23:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:38:45 -0400 Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | As the QA lead, I am requesting that until the Council convenes and > | decides on how we should proceed, that we not add anything else to > | the tree for the sole reason of supporting another package manager's > | features. This includes profiles or any other packages. This will > | reduce headaches for all of us, and hopefully cut down on needless > | arguments that get us no where. > > Several arch teams have already stated their intention to go ahead with > a Paludis profile, be it top level (ideal) or as a subprofile of their > own individual profiles. Is there any technical reason that the QA lead > wants to override the arch teams' wishes?
Adding profiles is technically broken. This is a QA violation, so very much a QA lead problem. Further it creates a split in the gentoo organization. That makes it a metastructure, i.e. ME, problem. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpGFJIWDvFxI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
