On Wednesday 24 May 2006 08:04, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 22:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 21:18, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 06:41, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > >> The package sys-apps/paludis is in the wrong category. It is a > > > >> package manager on par with rpm, dpkg, etc. Those live in app-arch. > > > > > > > > app-arch is for things that manage archives > > > > > > > > paludis is much more than an archive manager > > > > > > Do you propose we also move app-arch/rpm and app-arch/dpkg to wherever > > > paludis goes? > > > > you could make an argument for rpm but not dpkg > > > > dpkg is used simply to manipulate .debs, it isnt apt-get > > Huh? You can use dpkg directly to install software, just like rpm. It > would be like saying that rpm doesn't count because it isn't "up2date" > or "yum".
then you have a pretty simple choice ... either portage moves to app-arch as well or we look at it being a Gentoo thing Gentoo package managers are critical thus sys-apps ... all other package managers are not critical thus app-arch -mike
pgpl5RhbVkobU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
