On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT] > > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on > > the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements. > > Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP that I posted to -dev > (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) that was either > overlooked in the rest of that thread or ignored because people > considered it to be useless; I'm not sure which. In any event, I just > want to bring it to the council's attention as an alternative approach.
Realize you'ure after keeping it open, but there is more to the tree then just ebuilds- 1) what sparked it all: profiles 2) metadata/glsa, 3) version ordering between ebuilds (is 1.06 greater then 1.051? Answer might surprise you ;) Etc- potential food for thought... ~harring
pgpZE7KJRkhwA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
