On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 04:10 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > > There are *many* applications in the tree that do not use ALSA, but work > > only via the OSS emulation. Removing this is a bad idea and it would > > definitely be blocked by the games team. Probably half of the packages > > that I maintain require OSS capabilities. > > but they do not require an oss use flag. The point of removing this flag is > to remove "optional" oss support.
Umm... you don't know what you're talking about. The "optional" OSS support is in ALSA. The packages have required OSS for sound support. > Have a look at http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=&use=oss for the > useage of this flag. I know what the flag is used for, and I'm not removing it. > And for your games argument. The games ebuilds from the above list I have > looked at, provide both the "alsa" and the "oss" use flag, as do most > really. Do you even know what you're talking about? Have you tried Quake 3? Enemy Territory? Have you noticed that they don't have sound, at all, without OSS emulation? You do know how OSS emulation is turned on, correct? Please do me a favor and quit wasting my time and yours trying to tell me what the packages that I maintain support. > It is not about removing OSS emulation, it is about removing duplicated > backends. You're simply wrong. > > So does anyone have any objections to the others being removed? > > (apm imlib mikmod motif xmms) > > foomaticdb is missing here, I hope you will not forget it It isn't the the desktop profile. It was in the 2006.1 profile, which is desktop's parent. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
